The Babies Who Learned Mandarin From a Person, Not a Screen

In 2003 Patricia Kuhl's lab in Seattle took a group of nine-month-old American babies and tried to teach them Mandarin.

None of them had ever heard it. Over four weeks they each got twelve sessions: native Mandarin speakers playing with them, reading to them, talking to them. A control group got the same sessions in English.

The design had a second layer, and that is the one worth remembering. Some babies sat with a live tutor. Others watched the very same tutors, recorded — same people, same books, same toys, same number of minutes — on a screen. A third group heard the audio only.

One group learned. The others did not.

The babies with a live person in the room learned to hear a Mandarin sound distinction that English does not use — performing like babies raised in Taiwan. In twelve sessions.

The video group and the audio group showed no measurable gain over the babies who had never heard a word of Mandarin.

Kuhl's later work gave this a name: speech learning appears to be gated by the social brain. The language-learning machinery does not switch on just because language is arriving. Something about another person being there turns it on.

But it is not about the screen

Here is the part that gets dropped when this study is quoted, and it changes the conclusion completely.

In 2014 Roseberry, Hirsh-Pasek and Golinkoff taught toddlers new verbs in three ways: in person, over live video chat, and by pre-recorded video of the same session. The in-person group learned. The video-chat group learned too. The pre-recorded group did not.

So the variable was never the glass. It was whether the person on the other side responds to you — pauses when you look away, answers what you actually said, reacts in the second you need it. Researchers call this social contingency. A recording, however good, has none of it.

What to take from it

1. Keep the input. Podcasts, series and books are the cheapest raw material you will ever get — just stop expecting them to produce speech.
2. Judge any tool by one question: does it react to me? An app that marks an answer right or wrong is not reacting to you. A person is.
3. Online is not the compromise here. Live is the variable, not the room. A video call with a real person beats a recording of a better teacher.

Our Conversation Labs run online and in Barcelona, and the research says that is not the important difference. The important difference is that someone is listening to you in real time.

Sources

• Kuhl, P. K., Tsao, F.-M., & Liu, H.-M. (2003). Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(15), 9096–9101. Open access
• Roseberry, S., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2014). Skype me! Socially contingent interactions help toddlers learn language. Child Development, 85(3), 956–970. Open access
• Kuhl, P. K. (2007). Is speech learning "gated" by the social brain? Developmental Science, 10(1), 110–120. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00572.x
• Anderson, D. R., & Pempek, T. A. (2005). Television and very young children. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(5), 505–522. doi.org/10.1177/0002764204271506

← All The Science of Speaking articles